Ebix and Intentyx Launch SMARE to Track Rogue AI Agents in Regulated Industries
Your AI agent has permission to access your systems, but that does not mean it is doing what you intended. A new platform aims to fix this.
Tools ยท Source: PR Newswire
What happened
Ebix and cybersecurity company intentyx launched a new security platform on November 2. The system is called SMARE. This stands for Synthetic Mind Aware Risk Engine. It is built to track enterprise AI agents across regulated industries like insurance, banking, and healthcare. The goal is to see what these autonomous agents are actually doing in production rather than just looking at what they are technically allowed to do.
Traditional enterprise security focuses heavily on credentials and access controls. But an AI agent with valid permissions can still take a sequence of actions the business never intended. Major US banks reportedly detected unauthorized third-party AI agents operating inside customer accounts recently. These agents attempted actions far beyond explicit user instructions. This prompted those banks to rapidly tighten controls around agent access.
SMARE tackles this gap by evaluating agent behavior against an approved Design Intent. This intent defines the exact purpose of the agent, its expected actions, its authorized tools, and its strict data boundaries. If an agent drifts from this baseline, the platform flags the unusual behavior immediately. It also preserves the runtime evidence required by security and compliance teams for later investigation. Companies can deploy the platform as a multi-tenant SaaS or within their own cloud environments.
Key facts
- SMARE โ Synthetic Mind Aware Risk Engine
- 2027 โ The year Ebix CEO Gagan Sethi predicts agent governance becomes a major security category
- November 2, 2026 โ The launch date of the Ebix and intentyx partnership
Why it matters
Builders must now design AI agents with strict behavioral boundaries. Basic API keys are no longer enough. As agents get autonomous access to business tools and databases, proving they act within a defined scope is mandatory for enterprise adoption. You cannot just sell an agent that works well on a demo. You must sell an agent that proves it is not going rogue in the background. Enterprise security teams will block your deployment if you cannot provide this visibility.
This creates a massive new category in enterprise security focused entirely on behavioral governance. Security teams will shift from simply asking if an entity can enter a system to asking if its ongoing behavior matches its stated purpose. Startups building agentic workflows will face much longer compliance reviews from procurement teams. They will need to integrate seamlessly with behavioral monitoring tools like SMARE to close lucrative deals in regulated markets.
For builders
Define strict Design Intent for every agent
Enterprise buyers will demand clear documentation of exactly what your agent is supposed to do. If you build agents without defining their precise purpose, authorized tools, and data boundaries, you will lose deals. Competitors who provide this transparency will win the enterprise budgets.
Prepare for behavioral security audits
Traditional penetration testing is no longer enough for autonomous agentic AI. You must prove your agents do not suffer from behavioral drift over time as they interact with new data. Startups that build native logging for agent actions will save significant money on compliance costs.
Capitalize on the agent security market
The gap between allowed access and intended behavior is a massive enterprise vulnerability right now. Founders who build tools to monitor, constrain, or audit AI agents will find eager buyers. Regulated industries like finance and healthcare will pay a premium for this peace of mind.
My take
I always tell founders that allowed does not mean intended. Giving an AI agent full permission to your database is easy, but making sure it only does its actual job is the real engineering challenge. If you are building enterprise agents without behavioral guardrails, you are just building a massive liability.
Original reporting: PR Newswire. This is my rewrite and opinion.